Guys I’ m in favour of doing that, but fairly, how is that going to help the forum grow?
we been doing the same thing one and another with the same poor results, (otherwise the forum would be full of people). I understand if you got a big bag you wanna get your share but that is more of something to do with the treasury funds than how to expand the forum.
This will bring more disbalance in our ecosystem which is already struggling, this should be something done after sorting the forum and governance through the forum
It’s not about bags it’s all about early participation & this will greatly attract that . You can check those voting there are literally not enough bags to vote anyway < 40k & < 100k otherwise we would have crossed quorum already
Most people participating in forum activities are people who have big investment in 1inch. which are the same users that we have.
It would momentarily but people would see there is nothing much after that. That is why i propose first sort the forum, lets make it attractive, easy to access and to educate new people. then release the bags so the new people will participate.
As the treasury grow more and more the rewards for snapshot participation will also grow . Soon with such participation we can join more tools to bring the audience to forum too . This snapshot thing is easy to do but ofcourse an expirement we should fiddle with
Nevertheless, as usual when we do some airdrop there will be new and announcement and people talking, if the forum is not ready to keep people before hand people will just go as it happened before, there are big news in crypto everyday.
Treasury is more than ready to start taking projects such as the forum upgrade.
We should be a bit more patience before creating FOMO.
if forum upgrade also a need to go thro snapshot voting it won’t be able to pass the quorum but if add a flavor to it , it can attract a lot of users to such votings like it happened with liquidity mining
I know I’ve probably posted the same opinion in the past, but I personally take the position that rewards equivalent to the now suspended staking rewards should be proportional not only to the amount of staking, but also to the duration of staking.
I also believe that the rewards should not be compressed by applying the curve I presented earlier to the amount of staking.
Because of the above ideas, we were not concerned about multiple accounts at all.
We believe that applying anything other than staking volume and duration to rewards can decimate staking.
We believe that the decline of staking could also lead to a further decline in the value of 1inch.
Why do we think so? Because not all of us want to be active in forums. This means that people who have a lot of money to stake and don’t care much about forums will leave 1inch and move on to other solutions because they will be paid less.
If you want to reward activity to keep the forum active, you can do so in the form of
Instead of a recurring fee,
It may have already been done, but…
I think it would be better to reward the results of the activities rather than the activities themselves, such as holding a hackathon or an idea contest, voting on the ideas that come up, and rewarding the team that comes up with the winning idea.
we need to have incentives for people to see this as something cool. right now we don’t have a community. this is like a town hall and we, the people, are voicing out ideas. I think we need to build this and then people will come. if people feel like they’re part of something, something that is pivotal, as crypto is, they will become part of the movement. When and how can we start?